DNM: experiment with source structure

[Stringy]

Description

A detailed explanation of the changes in your PR.

Feel free to remove this section if it is overkill for your PR, and the title of your PR is sufficiently descriptive.

Checklist

• [ ] Investigated and inspected CI test results
• [ ] Updated documentation accordingly

Automated testing

• [ ] Added unit tests
• [ ] Added integration tests
• [ ] Added regression tests

If any of these don't apply, please comment below.

Testing Performed

TODO(replace-me) Use this space to explain how you tested your PR, or, if you didn't test it, why you did not do so. (Valid reasons include "CI is sufficient" or "No testable changes") In addition to reviewing your code, reviewers must also review your testing instructions, and make sure they are sufficient.

For more details, ref the Confluence page about this section.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 27.53%. Comparing base (cb5166e) to head (549ff10).

:white_check_mark: All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #2098   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   27.53%   27.53%           
=======================================
  Files          93       93           
  Lines        5724     5724           
  Branches     2532     2532           
=======================================
  Hits         1576     1576           
  Misses       3481     3481           
  Partials      667      667           

Flag	Coverage Δ
collector-unit-tests	27.53% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.