hodlbod

It does give users more control: send to self for convenience, send to backup for retention in emergencies, don't send and limit retention to the current device.

@water783 are you planning on large communities in 0xchat? I think this NIP is not intended to cover that use case, but I'd love to work with you on building...

I would prefer if `q` could point to anything. There are good reasons to be able to quote non-kind 1's.

> `["q", , , , ]` This means the address is not indexable. It's also a lot of positional arguments. I think it would be better to quote either the...

> It would add a way for clients to avoid a REQ if they know they don't support that quoted event. This is what `k` is for > ``` >...

> Yep, with NIP-65, pubkey is more important than the relay URL, IMO. I've been thinking the same thing. As long as we can find a 10002 for a pubkey...

> it feels dirty I agree, it does, this might not be the best option. > Would we do this to "e" tags as well? I would think so, they're...

An address is the value of an `a` tag, so something like `34550::`

I hate adding positional arguments to tags, but this does solve the problem.

@Semisol yes, I know, we fundamentally disagree on the viability of this approach. I've been thinking it over for three months at this point, and have gotten input from many...