secure-ls
secure-ls copied to clipboard
10 add support for custom storage type - [NEEDS WORK]
Closes #10
Coverage increased (+0.02%) to 85.898% when pulling 4eb4ab84aece970b6bb0814068ed6f68cecf1a13 on fonkgoku:10-add-support-for-custom-storage-type into 0c4bbfded098ae015fb0c34b09421717ad15401f on softvar:master.
I actually wrote a test for the additional functionality, should I do something about the decreased test coverage?
@softvar it would be great if you could take a look at this, thank you!
@fonkgoku @4F2E4A2E Sure. kinda busy with office work, will check this weekend surely. Meanwhile, can you please take out some time to write some test cases for the new code and thereby maintaining the code coverage too. Thanks!
@softvar I added some more tests, looking forward to your review :)
I have reviewed the PR and left some comments. Addressing those comments would ensure the library would be working fine with both the types.
Also, since we have examples too, merging this PR without having sessionStorage examples would be incomplete. Please take out some time to add some sessionStorage examples in different files.
Feel free to ask if you have any doubt.
Thanks!
Any updates @fonkgoku ? Please let me know if you need any help from my side.
Sorry for the late reply, I was still waiting for a reply on this comment https://github.com/softvar/secure-ls/pull/11#discussion_r202618792