Dear Tobias, where are you?

[pa1okz]

No, not an issue by itself but a scream for action.

Many repeater operators depend on Svxlink nowadays. We (in the Netherlands) run national covered systems and have entered requests and usermods that hopefully be merged sooner than later.

We now run a rather old version of Svxlink for this reason and see many reasons to upgrade, but only after handling of the requests.

So hopefully we see you active again soon!

Best 73 and thanks!

Mischa PA1OKZ

[f5vmr]

Good day to all,

I find that the current and very up-to-date SVXLink as provided for on Github has the new protocols already in place as used on the Swedish and UK Portal system for example https://svxportal.sm2ampr.net/. So I wonder why you haven’t implemented this if you haven’t already. In addition Add DL1HRC and Waldek SP2 are running very advanced SVXLink systems including many experimental features for various digital interfaces.

I for one am looking for new innovations, but so far the Talk_group Protocol fills many of my needs.

73 Chris

On 1 Jun 2022, at 11:14, pa1okz @.***> wrote:

No, not an issue by itself but a scream for action.

Many repeater operators depend on Svxlink nowadays. We (in the Netherlands) run national covered systems and have entered requests and usermods that hopefully be merged sooner than later.

We now run a rather old version of Svxlink for this reason and see many reasons to upgrade, but only after handling of the requests.

So hopefully we see you active again soon!

Best 73 and thanks!

Mischa PA1OKZ

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe. You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.