Sigurd Spieckermann

@p1c2u Could you please review this PR? Do you insist on covering the two currently uncovered sections? The equivalent sections for unmarshaling `oneOf` in `ObjectUnmarshaller::_unmarshal_object` are not covered either at...

@p1c2u Tests are passing now. Would you mind doing a review?

@p1c2u Since you've been quite active again recently, I've been wondering about your opinion on this topic. 🙂 I've noticed your 👍 reaction to this vague idea. Would you (and...

I'd love to see this PR merged. @allcaps Will you be able to finish it?

@p1c2u Since you've been quite active again recently, I've been wondering about your opinion on this topic. 🙂

Thanks for your honest feedback, @p1c2u. 🙏 I'd love to see this project (and also the other related ones) become the default choice for spec-first APIs in Python. A topic...

What's your take on the following? Figuring out the minimum versions of dependencies seems to be quite tricky. I believe there are two questions to answer: 1. What's the minimum...

The discriminator field helps in returning more specific errors, i.e. only errors of sub-schemas for which the discriminator field value of the instance is valid are returned. This is useful...

I think the main problem is that `remark-parse` doesn't recognize this non-standard syntax and treats it as regular prose.

I'd have preferred just the "N", but I guess the full wordmark is not too wide and doesn't have gradient transitions. :+1: