Ondra Pelech

one option would be to run `; unlock; reload; lock` (and possibly `scalafmtSbt` if `scalafmt` is being used in the project) in sbt, after it updates the version of the...

/cc @tkawachi

Please excuse a humble question from a random person on the internet: > move away from using a `List` to represent headers, and instead use something like `Map[String, List[String]]` But...

OK, so if I understand the issue correctly, we often need to append to headers (at the end), which is O(n) with `List`. So why not then use `Vector[Header.Raw]` (potentially...

Or, as per https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2616#section-4.2 > _The order in which header fields with differing field names are received is not significant._ However, it is "good practice" to send general-header fields first,...

Yep, you and the RFC have convinced me :smile_cat: So `Map[String, Vector[String]]` in the end?

> 1. The layer is part of the public API: > 2. The layer is not part of the public API: 3. The layer is part of a module in...

> I see (3) as a subset of (1) Here's where I see the difference between (1) and (3). When creating a library (1), you really need to make sure...

this issue deserves the [`scala-native` badge](https://github.com/zio/zio/issues?q=label%3Ascala-native)

the PR with Scala Nativem implementation has been merged. now we need to wire it up with in the CI, so that it gets tested and released