Scott Fauerbach

Results 227 comments of Scott Fauerbach

Hostname resolution was added, it can be turned off via Options.Builder().noResolveHostnames() Do you happen to have a stacktrace for that exception, maybe we can find a way to address it.

It's needed because hostname resolution was added and made as the default. It is possible that there is a way for resolution to work properly, which is why I needed...

So that didn't help. I guess I need to talk to our Kubernetes guy to figure out how exactly ip addresses are resolved and why it doesn't fail. I guess...

If I build a snapshot from a branch, would you be able to test? I'll add some debug to the hostname resolution and we'll see what exactly the resolver does.

Can you try this: ``` import io.nats.client.Connection; import io.nats.client.Nats; import io.nats.client.Options; import io.nats.client.api.ServerInfo; import io.nats.client.support.NatsUri; import java.net.InetAddress; import java.net.URISyntaxException; import java.net.UnknownHostException; public class TestResolve { public static void main(String[] args)...

I'm going to make some assumptions, please correct me if I'm wrong: 1. what is being resolved is `nats://localhost:4222` 2. Given `InetAddress a`, `a.getHostAddress()` is returning something like `10.111.7.11://10.111.7.11:4222` 3....

@z0mb1ek Apologies I was out of office for the last 2 weeks for a personal issue. If you can confirm the last reply item 2, I can make a fix.

For java/.net * JSManagement already provides to get stream list with filter. * Ordered consumer is not implemented yet, but consumer info cannot be called without a consumer and consumer.info...

> Here is the PR: [nats-io/nats-server#4217](https://github.com/nats-io/nats-server/pull/4217) > > Before 2.10, you would need to do the same as old Go client did: First call info, them create / update or...

this is java/.net validation. These clients limit subjects on management and subscribe to printable characters. I can remove the printable restriction if required, it would be backward compatible. ``` String[]...