enhancement_proposals
enhancement_proposals copied to clipboard
Enhancement proposals for scikit-learn: structured discussions and rational for large additions and modifications
In SLEP012, it suggests a new attribute, `input_feature_names_`, onto the estimators: https://github.com/scikit-learn/enhancement_proposals/blob/master/slep012/proposal.rst#L25 Is this in scope of the SLEP?
I think we should augment the template to start with a motivation and an example of what the solution will look like to users.
There's lots of implementations and issues on this, but we couldn't get consensus. We need a SLEP.
This is not a PR because I didn't write this yet. It's more a very loose RFC. I think scorers might need to be able to distinguish between training and...
This SLEP intends to have a discussion to define a clear guideline allowing to accept external contribution in the scikit-learn blog post.