docs.scala-lang
docs.scala-lang copied to clipboard
modify/correct _zh-cn/index.md
modify/correct some translation in _zh-cn/index.md according to latest English version.
@benluo First of all, thank you for your work, it would be better if you could create new pull request. Because big PR isn't easy to be reviewed.
I don't know how to split my pull request. Any way, I will wait to commit my git until you review and merge all translation to main branch.
Hi, @benluo I see the some comments is closed, please resolve it or give a reasonable explanation.
@liufengyun It's almost done, so please take a look.
@jxnu-liguobin I modified translation according to all your comments in my latest commit. So i closed your comments without feedback. Please check my latest commit (300d5cd.
@jxnu-liguobin I modified translation according to all your comments in my latest commit. So i closed your comments without feedback. Please check my latest commit (300d5cd.
sry. It was my misreading.
Any timeline when approved commits will be merged into main/master?
Any timeline when approved commits will be merged into main/master?
Any timeline when approved commits will be merged into main/master?
sorry, PR is too large. Because you didn't split it, which will make the review time unpredictable
btw, I thought about it, maybe, it is better not to translate sum type?
I don't have 《Scala编程第5版》. Do you want to use all terms translation from that book?
Hi @SethTisue, Since this PR is really too huge (I'm not looking at it very carefully), do we need to split it into multiple smaller ones? or merge it first and then wait for other volunteers to modify it subsequently.
Our usual approach with translations is to merge something even if it isn't perfect, and figure it can always be improved later.
The CI failure needs attention, though?
Our usual approach with translations is to merge something even if it isn't perfect, and figure it can always be improved later.
The CI failure needs attention, though?
corrected.
this also looks like https://github.com/scala/docs.scala-lang/pull/2510, which should come first?
this also looks like #2510, which should come first?
Yes, I think this pr should be merged at first.
thank you @benluo and @jxnu-liguobin !