sandstrom

I'm doing some issue gardening 🌱🌿 🌷 and came upon this issue. Since it's quite old I just wanted to ask if this is still relevant? If it isn't, maybe...

I'm doing some issue gardening 🌱🌿 🌷 and came upon this issue. Since it's quite old I just wanted to ask if this is still relevant? If it isn't, maybe...

Good question! @dentarg If you would like to, I'm sure @lkfortuna (PM working with Github Actions) can get you into the beta, since this action is widely used.

@dentarg Ah, got it! I would love to help out, but I don't know the details of this action well enough, sorry.

@dentarg Yeah, I know 😄 I've learned a lot by doing things (self-thought), just that I haven't yet spent that much time with JS-based Github Actions. I do contribute to...

@lkfortuna @Steve-Glass Somewhat off topic, but is there a reason why the `setup-python` and `setup-node` actions are managed by Github, but this action lives outside?

We'd prefer to only using official actions (or our own). Since there are already actions/setup-node, actions/setup-go, actions/setup-python, etc ([examples here](https://github.com/actions/?q=setup&type=&language=)). Would it be a better idea to move ruby/setup-ruby into...

This would solve a lot of headaches around cache logic and such. Especially since it's not possible to use post steps in Reusable Workflows either.

Good idea! No biggie, but is 'webmanifest' common enough to warrant default inclusion? I'd never heard of it and [browser support](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Manifest) isn't very good (not supported by Safari, for example)....

Is this repo ment to mirror https://github.com/tastejs/todomvc/? Perhaps it's easier to just mark this repo as read-only (archived) and add a link in the README directing people to the todomvc...