Richard Feldman

Sounds good! On Sat, Jun 24, 2017, 11:27 AM Jasper Woudenberg wrote: > @rtfeldman I plan on closing it this > weekend. I got four responses so far that didn't...

In 0.19 we can (and should, I think!) introduce this feature in this repo. In the meantime I have an idea for how to do it in `node-test-runner`.

I agree that `any : List Expectation -> Expectation` could facilitate writing worse tests, and I also agree that @avh4's proposed `any : List (subject -> Expectation) -> subject ->...

I don't think it will cause problems then. We can just kill off any in-progress workers as soon as we hit the cutoff.

Might also be worth having timeouts around fuzzing and shrinking - like if a fuzzer is taking too long to generate values, then time out and fail the test with...

> However, I kind of like the idea of "recommended" libraries over a comprehensive list. Yeah - the alternative would get out of hand pretty quickly. Personally I'm comfortable recommending...

Yeah, I think we should archive this repo. Any objections?

Love it! Looks good to me!

I'm cool with saying "this is ready to merge, but let's not push the button yet." On Sun, Jul 9, 2017, 12:45 PM Max Goldstein wrote: > This looks good...

Sample: ```elm [ test "Can decode a category with a learning path" Json.Decode.decodeString Decoder.category categoryJson |> Expect.isOk ```