Richard Feldman

Yep, we just encountered this too. Steps to reproduce: 1. Make an `elm-package.json` with the line `"evancz/elm-html": "4.0.0

> just a regular dependency referencing a directory above, like "user/pkgname": ".." Yeah, this seems like a better way to go for local dependencies. :+1: Also totally agree on `"user/lib":...

@naddeoa could you start a thread on [elm-discuss](https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/elm-discuss) explaining those scenarios and linking to them here? It would be useful to know about them. 😃

This is becoming a problem for our build servers as our number of dependencies increases. If any one of the dependencies fails to download, the whole build dies, so we're...

> I use the second example in the "debatable winners" section quite frequently. It often looks better to use the operator instead of the parentheses I never use it that...

> removing the ability to use single-line, single instance function application operators seems to me to diminish the expressiveness of the language. I can think of situations where putting such...

@avh4 I agree with both of your points. I think the parens version and the `let` version, respectively, are even better. The reason I proposed turning the `

> A question this raises then, is why should single-line expressions with `>>` and ` String.toLower) users ``` I think there’s a more compelling case for `` here than there...

I agree on `type` - I just think leading pipes (what F# does) is better. No argument here. I have a fairly wild idea when it comes to the other...

So this is two separate ideas, yeah? ## Removing Single-Line vs Multiline Choice I talked to James (creator of prettier) last week and he pointed out that people complain about...