ropensci-review-bot

Results 559 comments of ropensci-review-bot

Please add this badge to the README of your package repository: ```md [![Status at rOpenSci Software Peer Review](https://badges.ropensci.org/556_status.svg)](https://github.com/ropensci/software-review/issues/556) ``` Furthermore, if your package does not have a NEWS.md file yet,...

@eeholmes added to the reviewers list. Review due date is 2023-01-03. Thanks @eeholmes for accepting to review! Please refer to [our reviewer guide](https://stats-devguide.ropensci.org/pkgreview.html). rOpenSci’s community is our best asset. We...

@santikka added to the reviewers list. Review due date is 2023-01-04. Thanks @santikka for accepting to review! Please refer to [our reviewer guide](https://stats-devguide.ropensci.org/pkgreview.html). rOpenSci’s community is our best asset. We...

:calendar: @eeholmes you have 2 days left before the due date for your review (2023-01-03).

:calendar: @santikka you have 2 days left before the due date for your review (2023-01-04).

Couldn't find entry for _santikka_ in the reviews log

Thanks for submitting to rOpenSci, our editors and @ropensci-review-bot will reply soon. Type `@ropensci-review-bot help` for help.

## Checks for [chopin (v0.6.2.20240423)](https://github.com/NIEHS/chopin) git hash: [26153abb](https://github.com/NIEHS/chopin/tree/26153abbea0d0ebd06c6ede47c8760d9c0c84d37) - :heavy_check_mark: Package name is available - :heavy_check_mark: has a 'codemeta.json' file. - :heavy_multiplication_x: does not have a 'contributing' file. - :heavy_multiplication_x:...