ropensci-review-bot

Results 595 comments of ropensci-review-bot

:rocket: Editor check started :wave:

## Checks for [baRulho (v2.1.0)](https://github.com/maRce10/baRulho) git hash: [36f90248](https://github.com/maRce10/baRulho/tree/36f902483df4bbd329ab0325568b2b9aa6a1a684) - :heavy_check_mark: Package is already on CRAN. - :heavy_check_mark: has a 'codemeta.json' file. - :heavy_check_mark: has a 'contributing' file. - :heavy_check_mark: uses...

Please add this badge to the README of your package repository: ```md [![Status at rOpenSci Software Peer Review](https://badges.ropensci.org/609_status.svg)](https://github.com/ropensci/software-review/issues/609) ``` Furthermore, if your package does not have a NEWS.md file yet,...

@mikemahoney218 added to the reviewers list. Review due date is 2023-10-26. Thanks @mikemahoney218 for accepting to review! Please refer to [our reviewer guide](https://devguide.ropensci.org/reviewerguide.html). rOpenSci’s community is our best asset. We...

@mikemahoney218: If you haven't done so, please fill [this form](https://airtable.com/shrnfDI2S9uuyxtDw) for us to update our reviewers records.

Review due date for @mikemahoney218 is now 03-November-2023

Thanks for submitting to rOpenSci, our editors and @ropensci-review-bot will reply soon. Type `@ropensci-review-bot help` for help.

## Checks for [gigs (v0.4.1)](https://github.com/lshtm-gigs/gigs/) git hash: [a9d9654a](https://github.com/lshtm-gigs/gigs//tree/a9d9654a1845156391959fd1165d38cd94dad340) - :heavy_check_mark: Package name is available - :heavy_check_mark: has a 'codemeta.json' file. - :heavy_check_mark: has a 'contributing' file. - :heavy_check_mark: uses 'roxygen2'....

## 'srr' standards compliance: - Complied with: 53 / 102 = 52% (eda: 8 / 34; general: 45 / 68) - Not complied with: 49 / 102 = 48% (eda:...