ropensci-review-bot

Results 559 comments of ropensci-review-bot

Please add this badge to the README of your package repository: ```md [![Status at rOpenSci Software Peer Review](https://badges.ropensci.org/489_status.svg)](https://github.com/ropensci/software-review/issues/489) ``` Furthermore, if your package does not have a NEWS.md file yet,...

@kingaa added to the reviewers list. Review due date is 2022-05-27. Thanks @kingaa for accepting to review! Please refer to [our reviewer guide](https://ropenscilabs.github.io/statistical-software-review-book/pkgreview.html).

@kingaa: If you haven't done so, please fill [this form](https://airtable.com/shrnfDI2S9uuyxtDw) for us to update our reviewers records.

Thanks for submitting to rOpenSci, our editors and @ropensci-review-bot will reply soon. Type `@ropensci-review-bot help` for help.

Oops, something went wrong with our automatic package checks. Our developers have been notified and package checks will appear here as soon as we've resolved the issue. Sorry for any...

## Checks for [dynamite (v0.0.1)](https://github.com/santikka/dynamite) git hash: [a8d932ca](https://github.com/santikka/dynamite/tree/a8d932ca347206c8602b1c8fe3a60d4f83bb66d7) - :heavy_check_mark: Package name is available - :heavy_check_mark: has a 'codemeta.json' file. - :heavy_check_mark: has a 'contributing' file. - :heavy_multiplication_x: The following...