Robbie van Leeuwen
Robbie van Leeuwen
Hi @TLCFEM thanks for the suggestion! I like that this would allow for better optimisation as caching from the geometric analysis can be better utilised. I will have a think...
Hi @TLCFEM sorry for the delayed response, I've been very busy with my course at uni! Ok, that makes sense, I think it would be good to keep the default...
@connorferster - seeing as you wrote the original code for this, wondering if you have time to have a quick look?
Thoroughly enjoyed the stream - helps with the code review as well 😆 Shapely is such a fun and feature rich library! `mypy` - happy to ignore these two lines,...
Hi @Ernst79, thanks for submitting the issue. This has been fixed with #429. There will be a new release shortly that incorporates this fix!
Thanks for this, I think this ties in closely with the third task in #68 so hopefully I can fix this as well!
Will have a look into this, feeling like the mentioning of units could scope creep this one into including [``forallpeople``](https://github.com/connorferster/forallpeople)! @connorferster thoughts on integrating ``forallpeople`` into ``concrete-properties`` for someone who...
Thanks for the info @connorferster! Maybe I'll look into using it for post-processing only similar to the suggestion in the OP, but maybe a bit more intelligent/extended.
Hi @ChinoCodeDemon, Sorry for the delayed response! The two calculation loops that are expensive and could be computed in parallel are: 1. Moment interaction diagram - loop starts [here](https://github.com/robbievanleeuwen/concrete-properties/blob/master/concreteproperties/concrete_section.py#L1109). 2....
Hi @Agent6-6-6, this example is inconsistent, the compressive strength should be modified ``compressive_strength=40``. I'll update this once this discussion is closed out. As far as I'm aware, no other modules...