Reid Draper

+1

+1. I might be able to grab this in the next couple of weeks.

What's the driving factor here? Why not simply test these patches even though you're 'optimistic' they'll pass? Are you constrained by build-resources? If you want, you can always manually merge...

> The idea is to merge multiple PRs together and build/test them all once. Right, but _why_?

The above suggestions seem rather complex. But I suppose I don't really care too much as long as the feature is either hidden behind a flag, or the _repository_ _owner_...

We've been running into the same issue at Basho. I have a proof-of-concept to simply call bors from the cmd-line when a webhook fires, but unfortunately there are a few...

I looked into using Squid for us at Basho, but had quite a bit of trouble getting it to cache TLS requests to Github. Maybe nginx or Varnish will be...

I [proposed this](https://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/libraries/2013-November/021674.html) several years ago, and unfortunately have heard nothing from the QuickCheck maintainers.

@saurabhnanda have you looked at `Test.QuickCheck.Monadic.monadicIO`? Here's a little example: ``` haskell example :: Integer -> Property example x = monadicIO $ do _

@saurabhnanda yeah, looks like that should work fine, too. I was only intending to show a basic example of performing `IO` during a test.