Tim Ruffing

> Not sure, but [github.com/orgs/community/discussions/45830](https://github.com/orgs/community/discussions/45830) may be an issue... Oh okay, this makes `git archive` much more interesting...

We should revisit this before the next release. Whatever we decide on, we should update the release process to include a cursory manual inspection of the release tarball (are all...

To be honest, I wonder if this is required after https://github.com/bitcoin-core/secp256k1/pull/1646. Perhaps distros like signed tarballs instead of signed git tags?

0.7.0 was released with an "experimental" signed tarball, see https://github.com/bitcoin-core/secp256k1/pull/1707#issuecomment-3097021863 and the [release on github](https://github.com/bitcoin-core/secp256k1/releases/tag/v0.7.0). If no issues pop up with this, we should just add the instructions to the...