Daniel Markstedt

@stblassitude Thank you for your contribution to the community! I *think* all three of the current licenses in macipgw are compatible with netatalk's GPLv2, if we retroactively update the UCal...

I have started a PR here https://github.com/Netatalk/netatalk/pull/1543 It builds and runs on Debian locally, and the CI jobs suggest that it also builds on FreeBSD, NetBSD, OpenBSD, and any Linux...

Good call. I’ve ported all of the patches from Jason’s fork that seemed relevant, now. I also converted Stefan’s troff man page to xml, while documenting the new -u option...

The one major improvement area that I can see right now would be support for a macipgw.conf file as an alternative to the CLI options, as suggested by @H296 ....

Question for @jasonking3 and @aseering if you are seeing this message: Would you approve of re-licensing your code contributions to macipgw under the GNU GPL v2? The reason is to...

Thank you @jasonking3 – yes it is clearly spelled out in your repo that you did not change the license.

There are strong similarities to this early version of include/linux/list.h from the Linux kernel: https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/2.1.45/source/include/linux/list.h

I have now pushed the GPLv2 relicensing commit to the PR. Thanks again to Stefan and Jason! The two patches from Adam have been dropped from the changeset for now,...

Even better comparison is this very first revision (April 2005) of list.h from the official kernel git mirror: https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2/include/linux/list.h The logic is practically identical to our version, albeit with slightly...

Going even further back, this June 2002 revision is almost entirely identical. https://github.com/tbodt/linux-history/blob/b9a78e5991e18eb4c5f93d2d58e19f1708528dae/include/linux/list.h