Stephan Rasp

I am training our current setup with the pure super-resolution setup on my branch stephans_gan as a notebook 07. Will update later on how it went.

Really weird: Using the pure SR option with the same setup that produced somewhat reasonable results before does not work. The losses explode and the image looks crap.  This...

Hi Anna, here a quick update. 07 contains the close-to-Leinonen setup with the pure super-resolution approach. THIS DOES NOT WORK!? 08 contains the same setup with regular TIGGE to MRMS,...

Great, here a summary of my very confusing findings. BTW @annavaughan, I am working in the Experiments subdirectory of notebooks. TIGGE-->MRMS works sort of, also with the new sampling method....

@annavaughan Update on my experiments with lower learning rate. Started out encouraging but then wasn't so great after all. First up, I ran the TIGGE-MRMS setup that has previously "worked"...

@annavaughan So my MNIST test was a failure. I guess this tells us at least that it's not the data (which we already suspected) But then WHAT THE HELL IS...

@HirtM We need to decide which variables to download from TIGGE. You can see the available variables here: https://apps.ecmwf.int/datasets/data/tigge/levtype=sfc/type=cf/ (Also note the different levels on the left). Unfortunately, TIGGE doesn't...

Thanks a lot @HirtM! That's a lot of fields. We probably should start with the most important ones to keep data volumes down and prevent making the training too slow....

@anna-184702, here are some pointers for downloading the MRMS data. Here are the links for the data archive: https://mesonet.agron.iastate.edu/archive/ There is a link to the Google Drive files and there...

I hacked together a tigge download script. Pretty ugly but it works for deterministic. For ensemble there is still some bug and the data are quite large so I can't...