Rafael Winterhalter

There's been a ticket to support the feature you're wanting for a while, the verification error is adressed.

Isn't this what you were looking for? https://github.com/raphw/byte-buddy/issues/375

Of course, this makes sense. It would probably be possible to add a property like `ignoreUnsupported = true` to allow for such overrides. This makes sense; if I find the...

I abuse the field to note the report version. Sorry for the confusion.

Interesting. This would require that the default naming strategy is deterministic what is certainly possible, but it would likely also require reflection to work but this should be picked up...

Byte Buddy can now kind of work with this, as long as class names are deterministic. There are still some rough edges but we are moving forward, at least!

Hi, with 50 million monthly downloads API incompatibilities are normally reported by the same day. I avoid them for this reason and work with deprecation. I also use a tool...

That's true but from practice I still see ASM 3 flying around that has incompatible API. Especially when BB is used for tooling that aims for older JVMs, this is...

Byte Buddy does not use it internally but if you are using ASM, I recommend using byte-buddy-dep with your own ASM dependency. You should then shade Byte Buddy or isolate...

A feature was added to Byte Buddy that throws an exception if a class that is injected is already loaded. In Byte Buddy 1.9.*, any use unsafe (unofficial) API is...