Mrugesh Mohapatra

@rawatsushil We have changed course with the original requirements, and this no longer is a quick change of status codes. The implementation requires sending responses based on the user state,...

Hey, @rawatsushil, I am going ahead and closing this. Please feel free to open more PRs about other things you might be interested in.

Nice work so far. Please ensure you follow the PR checklist and not just tick things off; otherwise, we won't take you seriously. Respect the requirements to earn the respect...

> We never want to be sending html, correct? Yes - that is correct.

@ojeytonwilliams we enabled JSDoc; please rebase when you get a moment and address any linting issues. Thanks.

@naomi-lgbt once you are happy with comments, please resolve them.

There have been several discussions about this over the years (I would recommend a search if you are interested in the conversations), and largely it boils down to these limitations:...

Yup - I personally would rely on something other than local storage. As for the nature of the project code, if the code is used for evaluation and awarding a...

@Sembauke we enabled JSDoc; please rebase when you get a moment and address any linting issues. Thanks.

> if we could have an option to turn off the new behavior for development purpose. Sure go ahead and add a development mode flag for it, that you can...