Rachit Nigam
Rachit Nigam
Awesome! Looking forward to the PR!
@calebmkim can you update this tracker to reflect the current state of things. If we've moved the tracking to the evaluation repository, let's close this issue with a link to...
Agreed with @sampsyo
Looks like this has been fixed. @EclecticGriffin feel free to re-open if that is not the case
I assume we're not going to work on this so closing the issue
@cgyurgyik are there action items for the this tracker that we should be working on? If not, let's wrap up the issue
While working on fixing this, I came across this program which cannot be compiled correctly: ``` seq { if lt.out with C1 { A; } if lt.out with C2 {...
Okay, so I've realized that loops where we chain the condition check with the next group will also potentially suffer from the above problem. Consider: ``` while lt.out with C1...
Oh odd! Maybe it is not assigning a dynamic index type to the accesses memories?
Hm, the problem is that `perm[i]` needs to imply that all banks in a particular dimension need to be consumed. Currently, it is only saying that one bank is being...