pythcoiner

> Isn't having `watchonly_wallet_in_bitcoind_datadir` set to `false` for existing wallet sufficient? sure , i just worry in 10 years we can have a lot of flags like this :smile:

Closing #1115 for now, i've overlooked important points. I want to work on a new approach, but let's first summarize the key issues we have w/ remotes bitcoind: 1. Using...

running V5 rc1 i guess from @darosior on our TG: ``` Yes it's a bitcoind bug. Both using -rpcauth and upgrading to bitcoind 26.1 will fix it in Liana v5...

maybe we should notice @darosior is running `Ventura 13.5` vs @SXBT69 running `Sonoma 14.x` It looks we sharing the same context w/ #928 (also `Sonoma 14.x`)

I try to reproduce on a macOS Sonoma VM from master + bitcoind 26.1, but cannot reproduce. It looks to me it was a bitcoin core auth w/ cookie [issue](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28784)...

yes i mean URI, what i think we should do in this case is to extract adress and amount and fill each TextInput w/ the relevant data. It can be...

> Do you mean like having the descriptor checksum as part of the windows' title? Right

just look into this but it seems the feature not yet available on [iced side](https://github.com/iced-rs/iced/issues/904)

there is one [PR](https://github.com/iced-rs/iced/pull/2240) about this on iced repo

PR have been merged on iced side, i'll have a look