pytest
pytest copied to clipboard
Scopes of several files are merged when specifying a config using `-c`
Setup:
Python 3.9.9, pip list:
attrs 21.4.0
iniconfig 1.1.1
packaging 21.3
pip 21.3.1
pluggy 1.0.0
py 1.11.0
pyparsing 3.0.7
pytest 7.0.1
setuptools 60.5.0
tomli 2.0.1
wheel 0.37.1
(basically just whatever pip install pytest installs)
Files:
# <dir>/test/test_file1.py
import pytest
@pytest.fixture(autouse=True)
def some_fixture():
print("Fixture called")
def test_in_file1():
print("test_in_file1")
# <dir>/test/test_file2.py
def test_in_file2():
print("test_in_file2")
# <dir>/config/pytest.ini
[pytest]
Running with specifying the config from config explicitly executes the fixture for both tests:
py.test -c config/pytest.ini -s -v tests/test_file1.py tests/test_file2.py
config/::test_in_file1 Fixture called
test_in_file1
PASSED
config/::test_in_file2 Fixture called
test_in_file2
PASSED
Omitting the config, using a config from the root directory <dir>, or not specifying the test files explicitly (just py.test -c config/pytest.ini -s -v):
config/tests/test_file1.py::test_in_file1 Fixture called
test_in_file1
PASSED
config/tests/test_file2.py::test_in_file2 test_in_file2
PASSED
which is the behavior I would expect.
Downgrading to pytest==6.2.5 and running the command above (py.test -c config/pytest.ini -s -v tests/test_file1.py tests/test_file2.py) does not lead to the bug either. Interestingly enough, the "config" prefix is missing from the output:
tests/test_file1.py::test_in_file1 Fixture called
test_in_file1
PASSED
tests/test_file2.py::test_in_file2 test_in_file2
PASSED
Must be some config-based grouping feature introduced in 7?
at first glance this is a issue with node id computation messing up with relative pathnames, thanks for providing the comprehensible example, we need to add it to the testsuite
I think the problem here is both node ids are:
::test_in_file1
::test_in_file2
when ::test_in_file1 resolves its autouse fixtures it populates _nodeid_autousenames with an empty string key " so the parentnodeid for ::test_in_file2 looks it up in the dictionary and returns any autouse fixtures defined previously by ::test_in_file1 - I'm not sure why those nodeids are like that; but i'll take a look after lunch. I'd expect:
test/test_file1.py::test_in_file1
test/test_file2.py::test_in_file2
as nodeids respectfully here, heres a test that passes due to the breakage if anyone beats me to it!
def test_passing_config_works_correctly(pytester: pytest.Pytester) -> None:
"""Regression for #9703"""
test_sub = pytester.mkdir("test")
test_sub.joinpath("test_file1.py").write_text(
textwrap.dedent(
"""
import pytest
@pytest.fixture(autouse=True)
def some_fixture():
print("Fixture called")
def test_in_file1():
print("test_in_file1")
"""
)
)
test_sub.joinpath("test_file2.py").write_text(
textwrap.dedent(
"""
import pytest
def test_in_file2():
print("test_in_file2")
"""
)
)
config_sub = pytester.mkdir("config")
config_sub.joinpath("pytest.ini").write_text(
textwrap.dedent(
"""
[pytest]
"""
)
)
output = pytester.runpytest(
"-c",
"config/pytest.ini",
"-s",
"-v",
"test/test_file1.py",
"test/test_file2.py",
)
output.stdout.fnmatch_lines("test/test_file1.py::test_in_file1 Fixture called")
output.stdout.fnmatch_lines("test/test_file2.py::test_in_file2 test_in_file2")
Think this largely stems from rootdir being set to the config directory and the paths provided are technically not 'relative' to it; unfortunately didn't get much time today to look at it due to something unexpected that came up.
essentially the same as running pytest --rootdir config/ -s -v test/test_file1.py test/test_file2.py - problem is; I'm not sure on the appropriate 'fix' for this; is it partially human error here and we need to provide better errors? not quite sure yet
essentially the same as running
pytest --rootdir config/ -s -v test/test_file1.py test/test_file2.py
Why does specifying a config file set the rootdir? Shouldn't it be independent?
I don't know enough about the internals to answer that but I'm happy to look further into it when I wrap up some other things, hopefully someone in the know can give us some reasoning on that