Optionally generate a package which uses flit instead of classic setup.py

[nicoddemus]

Howdy!

Just passing by to leave this feature suggestion: optionally use flit instead of the classic setup.py for package publishing.

I plan to try out flit some time soon, and realized this was a valid enhancement request for cookiecutter-pytest-plugin. 😉

[hackebrot]

Hey @nicoddemus! 👋

I'm happy to add this as an option if you found it to be a suitable replacement for setup.py 👍

[nicoddemus]

I didn't get a chance of using it myself, but it seems like a great alternative for pure-python projects as is the case with the majority pytest plugins. 😁

[gyermolenko]

@nicoddemus flint->flit

[bluetech]

#61 switched to pyproject.toml, and has nothing setuptools specific other than the build backend, so there's not a whole lot of reason to use flit I think.