pymc icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
pymc copied to clipboard

Bayesian Modeling and Probabilistic Programming in Python

Results 463 pymc issues
Sort by recently updated
recently updated
newest added

It's probably because they are not pure RandomVariables. We need to update the `model_graph` logic to accommodate them

defects
help wanted

In PyMC discourse, I asked this [this](https://discourse.pymc.io/t/value-error-in-chains-for-a-gaussian-process/9894), and I reproduce here my code for convenience: ```python X = np.array([32, 38, 94, 83, 99, 78]) y = np.array([1702, 1514, 683, 269,...

## Description of your problem Getting an exception that I can't pass both `samples=500` and `keep_size=True` cant both be provided, but as a user I only pass samples, and then...

**Please provide a minimal, self-contained, and reproducible example.** ```python # %% import pymc as pm import numpy as np from functools import partial from pymc import sampling_jax import pytest rstate...

## Description of your problem PyMC sideliner here, who is finally taking a proper crack at it with 4.0. I find the distribution docstrings difficult to parse when viewing them...

major

Closes #5762. This PR removes `GaussianRandomWalkRV` altogether by defining an `rv_op` as a cumulative sum of distributions. The most recent version of AePPL, i.e. 0.0.31, is now able to retrieve...

aeppl-related

Addressing #5659 Kept the original dims in the log_jac_det by changing ``` def log_jac_det(self, value, *inputs): return at.sum(value[..., 1:], axis=-1) ``` to ``` def log_jac_det(self, value, *inputs): return at.sum(value[..., 1:],...

@canyon289 to resolve #5669, I have made some small changes mainly to aesaraf.py to include the dim names in the new_size tensor (https://github.com/pymc-devs/pymc/commit/6585f9021a17a7f0c9c833bf4700fab240d2164b) This solves the issue mainly and `test_model`...

addresses #5791 - [x] Inferring dims from named pandas indexes - [x] Inferring dims from DataArrays - [x] Inferring coords from DataArrays - [ ] A unit test - [...

enhancements

This tries to address #4807 Right now, it passes all unit tests, but doesn't use the fast sampling procedure of `sample_posterior_predictive` The code is also not feature-complete.

enhancements