pymc-resources icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
pymc-resources copied to clipboard

PyMC educational resources

Results 45 pymc-resources issues
Sort by recently updated
recently updated
newest added
trafficstars

The last line of the markdown cell under Code 4.26 reads as: "You can read more details of PyMC [here](http://pymc-devs.github.io/pymc/notebooks/getting_started.html)" However, it seems that the website associated to the hyperlink...

The previous `m4_3b` model resulted in a negative $\beta$-value which isn't consistent with what's in Prof. McElreath's "Statistical Rethinking" textbook. I've written a line of code to properly generate a...

Hello pymc team, I bumped into some error in using pymc v4 or pymc v3 (see previous issue raised by me), so I tried running the rethinking notebook with pymc...

I am using chapter 5 notebook. Everything worked until 5.34. which returned this error. Has anyone seen this before? I use WIndow11, anaconda, pymc v4, installed via yaml file for...

**Statistical rethinking lecture 2022 lecture -16, Pymc v5 conversion Added..** This is my first time opening a pull request for Pymc; thus Please let me know if something is wrong;...

Hello, on chapter 4 of the lesson there is a part dedicated to categorical variables (gender in this case). Although I was able to get some results I ma struggling...

# Thank you for opening a pull request! Please check our [style guide](https://docs.pymc.io/en/latest/contributing/jupyter_style.html), and also make sure that the notebooks you've modified pass the `pre-commit` checks. If, for example, you...

When I run the code for the quadratic approximation (attached below), I get a SD that is 4 times larger than the one in the book (0.64, instead of 0.16...

[issue](https://github.com/pymc-devs/pymc-resources/issues/164#issue-1036272255) #164 Noted that the Gaussian process code was only using one column of the distance matrix. I updated the input dimensions argument to use all 10 columns. Reran associated...

The solution to question 2H4 contains a mistake in the calculation of the posterior probability: $Pr(A|Test_A) = ... = \frac{0.8}{0.8+0.35} = 0.72$ The correct result is approx. 0.6957, the PR...