pulp-operator
pulp-operator copied to clipboard
[noissue]: Bump github.com/onsi/ginkgo/v2 from 2.25.3 to 2.27.2
Bumps github.com/onsi/ginkgo/v2 from 2.25.3 to 2.27.2.
Release notes
Sourced from github.com/onsi/ginkgo/v2's releases.
v2.27.2
2.27.2
Fixes
- inline automaxprocs to simplify dependencies; this will be removed when Go 1.26 comes out [a69113a]
Maintenance
- Fix syntax errors and typo [a99c6e0]
- Fix paragraph position error [f993df5]
v2.27.1
2.27.1
Fixes
- Fix Ginkgo Reporter slice-bounds panic [606c1cb]
- Bug Fix: Add GinkoTBWrapper.Attr() and GinkoTBWrapper.Output() [a6463b3]
v2.27.0
2.27.0
Features
Transforming Nodes during Tree Construction
This release adds support for
NodeArgsTransformers that can be registered withAddTreeConstructionNodeArgsTransformer.These are called during the tree construction phase as nodes are constructed and can modify the node strings and decorators. This enables frameworks built on top of Ginkgo to modify Ginkgo nodes and enforce conventions.
Learn more here.
Spec Prioritization
A new
SpecPriority(int)decorator has been added. Ginkgo will honor priority when ordering specs, ensuring that higher priority specs start running before lower priority specsLearn more here.
Maintenance
- Bump rexml from 3.4.0 to 3.4.2 in /docs (#1595) [1333dae]
- Bump github.com/gkampitakis/go-snaps from 0.5.14 to 0.5.15 (#1600) [17ae63e]
v2.26.0
2.26.0
Features
Ginkgo can now generate json-formatted reports that are compatible with the
go testjson format. Useginkgo --gojson-report=report.go.json. This is not intended to be a replacement for Ginkgo's native json format which is more information rich and better models Ginkgo's test structure semantics.
Changelog
Sourced from github.com/onsi/ginkgo/v2's changelog.
2.27.2
Fixes
- inline automaxprocs to simplify dependencies; this will be removed when Go 1.26 comes out [a69113a]
Maintenance
- Fix syntax errors and typo [a99c6e0]
- Fix paragraph position error [f993df5]
2.27.1
Fixes
- Fix Ginkgo Reporter slice-bounds panic [606c1cb]
- Bug Fix: Add GinkoTBWrapper.Attr() and GinkoTBWrapper.Output() [a6463b3]
2.27.0
Features
Transforming Nodes during Tree Construction
This release adds support for
NodeArgsTransformers that can be registered withAddTreeConstructionNodeArgsTransformer.These are called during the tree construction phase as nodes are constructed and can modify the node strings and decorators. This enables frameworks built on top of Ginkgo to modify Ginkgo nodes and enforce conventions.
Learn more here.
Spec Prioritization
A new
SpecPriority(int)decorator has been added. Ginkgo will honor priority when ordering specs, ensuring that higher priority specs start running before lower priority specsLearn more here.
Maintenance
- Bump rexml from 3.4.0 to 3.4.2 in /docs (#1595) [1333dae]
- Bump github.com/gkampitakis/go-snaps from 0.5.14 to 0.5.15 (#1600) [17ae63e]
2.26.0
Features
Ginkgo can now generate json-formatted reports that are compatible with the
go testjson format. Useginkgo --gojson-report=report.go.json. This is not intended to be a replacement for Ginkgo's native json format which is more information rich and better models Ginkgo's test structure semantics.
Commits
9a84c21v2.27.2a69113ainline automaxprocs to simplify dependencies; this will be removed when Go 1....a99c6e0Fix syntax errors and typof993df5Fix paragraph position error56cb393v2.27.12ce3f13reporters: add enhanced bounds checking in emitTimeline to prevent slice panicacf208aAdding check for malformed date51090a8Updating after docs run606c1cbFix Ginkgo Reporter slice-bounds panica6463b3Bug Fix: Add GinkoTBWrapper.Attr() and GinkoTBWrapper.Output()- Additional commits viewable in compare view
Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.
Dependabot commands and options
You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:
@dependabot rebasewill rebase this PR@dependabot recreatewill recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it@dependabot mergewill merge this PR after your CI passes on it@dependabot squash and mergewill squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it@dependabot cancel mergewill cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging@dependabot reopenwill reopen this PR if it is closed@dependabot closewill close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually@dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditionswill show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency@dependabot ignore this major versionwill close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)@dependabot ignore this minor versionwill close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)@dependabot ignore this dependencywill close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED
This pull-request has been approved by: dependabot[bot] Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign ipanova for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.
The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment
Hi @dependabot[bot]. Thanks for your PR.
I'm waiting for a github.com member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.
Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.
I understand the commands that are listed here.
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.