P. L. Lim

Where is this coming from? https://github.com/OpenAstronomy/github-actions-workflows/blob/2a7b8a89aa6eaf0cb6b87159e8913e99f819f4bf/.github/workflows/tox.yml#L130

Hmm for whatever reason, it is prepending the name of the workflow in this repo and the name of the job in this repo before showing the name in your...

Maybe this is an unavoidable one-time cost to transition then. How unfortunate.

Let's wait till after the Cloud FITS PR is merged first. Poor Geert.

Shouldn't you be asking this over at https://github.com/spacetelescope/gwcs/issues ? If possible, it would have been implemented as a low-level API, no?

Okay, so it is already possible and we can close this issue?

> Was this supposed to be in gwcs? No idea but let's see what GWCS devs say.

Okay, I am trying to understand the problem. So, it already works but someone needs to write docs somewhere? Is https://docs.astropy.org/en/latest/wcs/wcsapi.html#slicing-of-wcs-objects insufficient?

You didn't wrap it in `astropy.wcs.wcsapi.SlicedLowLevelWCS`.

p.s. I never did figure out how to write a `SlicedLowLevelWCS` object back to FITS header but that is a battle for another day...