technologies for OCK next steps

[mrchristian]

Hi,

I have a presentation for TIB colleagues tomorrow 29th Oct and I need to ask a couple of questions about the 'thoughts' on technology routes for OCKs proposed next steps. And whether there are: existing systems in place, choices already made, routes contemplated, or explorations being made.

• Building an open metadata or/and document repository - so how we could present the data collated by OCK in a usable form to the public?
• Knowledge Graph creation?

I would like to be able to present the current view on these two parts of the project as if we need input I can see what people can offer, or have ideas about.

Thanks

Simon

[petermr]

On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 4:09 PM Simon Worthington [email protected] wrote:

Hi,

I have a presentation for TIB colleagues tomorrow 29th Oct and I need to ask a couple of questions about the 'thoughts' on technology routes for OCKs proposed next steps. And whether there are: existing systems in place, choices already made, routes contemplated, or explorations being made.

• Building an open metadata or/and document repository - so how we could present the data collated by OCK in a usable form to the public?

The bibliographic metadata from JATS is extremely comprehensive (see (e.g.) https://github.com/petermr/climate/tree/master/searches/clim107/PMC3828158/sections/0_front and browse down also https://github.com/petermr/climate/tree/master/searches/clim107/PMC3828158/sections/2_back which contains the ref-list (citations). This allows us easily to extract all bibliographic metadata and (say) build a citation graph (though of course only in the closed set)

How it's presented is a UX question and we need volunteers

• Knowledge Graph creation?

I would like to be able to present the current view on these two parts of the project as if we need input I can see what people can offer, or have ideas about.

I will try to write something this evening about knowledge graph. It's basically the sum of articles, extracted components, dictionary annotations. It's starting to become useful for our medicinal plant project where we have very good standardised tables and sections. This might happen in some subsections of climate

I have created a CMIP project which has ca 930 open access papers. I think this will be very tractable as it's full of acronyms. Will depend on A+A beng involved.

Thanks

Simon

— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/petermr/climate/issues/29?email_source=notifications&email_token=AAFTCS2NDQLZQK2HV6IQ7S3QQ4FERA5CNFSM4JF4RGL2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFUVEXG43VMWVGG33NNVSW45C7NFSM4HUZ5XTQ, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAFTCS7ZRUEHTPQJT3SDUQDQQ4FERANCNFSM4JF4RGLQ .

-- Peter Murray-Rust Founder ContentMine.org and Reader Emeritus in Molecular Informatics Dept. Of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, CB2 1EW, UK