Paul Hoffman

Thanks for the "did not ignore". It would be swell if the LE folks let us do this.

I see it in that closed issue now. My use case is similar to the poster in #48, namely having walked away from a particular puzzle, not "let me start...

I captured that because, as expected, once the Datatracker got the new RFC from the RFC Editor, that URL works as expected.

Loving your idea of a "fun bonus". :-)

I think you mean "Names, when correctly encoded in the URL exactly as expected, work". This proposal is for searching to avoid:

I'm with Robert: just the basename, as is shown in 7992.

Maybe it could be. From a user's perspective, being able to go from the Datatracker to the mail archive, but not being able to go from the mail archive to...

Just to check: is bibxml-rfcsubseries the long-term solution for RFCs, STDs, and drafts? It appears to work today, but I have not seen this before.

I was working from https://authors.ietf.org/en/references-in-rfcxml, which should probably be updated. In addition, maybe the xml2rfc tool can make this as a suggestion when parsing.

So, now I'm very confused with this thread. If I read correctly, @rjsparks said above that bibxml-rfcsubseries should work for everything, but https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml-rfcsubseries/reference.RFC.9460.xml in the browser returns {"error": {"message": "Error...