patak
patak
I think it is interesting to have the option to add JS logic in the future too, so I would prefer to keep the current setup. But maybe you could...
Thanks for the heads up, we'll get this fixed on the site.
I would consider this more as a fix for an unintentional regression that a feat. So I think we could merge this one and release it in a patch. @poyoho...
I'm a bit lost here. IIUC, this PR only adds a test case now and shows that #9732 wasn't an issue since the file name for style.css is correctly modified...
I think we should close this one as stale, @sibbng @philipp-spiess if this is still an issue in Tailwinds v4, would you create an issue so we can properly track...
@ShenQingchuan in Vitest we have a setup that shows a preview for each commit that affects the docs: https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/pull/970. Would the action you used here do the same? @antfu do...
Added for discussion in the next meeting, let's check with him then.
Sorry for taking so much time @ShenQingchuan, v2.9 is out now, so getting back to this. Some questions: 1. So IIUC, we aren't trying to get netlify to send as...
. 4. Yes, only for `vX.X.X` . 3. Yes, and it is available as `secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN` https://docs.github.com/en/actions/security-guides/automatic-token-authentication . 1. and 2. I was only checking that I understood the implications and...
@ShenQingchuan I just saw that netlify auto-deploys now has a fixed URL for main: - https://main--vitejs.netlify.app/ This is great, as we can use it to check the current HEAD state...