Parse-SDK-Android
Parse-SDK-Android copied to clipboard
LDS Performance Improvements
This is a master issue for all things related to local datastore performance improvements.
- [x] Make LDS stop checkpointing and making copies of objects for mutable containers (#108)
- [ ] Make LDS query matching more efficient by not loading every object into memory for a specified pin.
- [ ] Make LDS use
ParseObjectStateandParseUserStateinstead ofParseObjectandParseUser, to reduce the amount of locking required for every LDS operation. - [ ] Improve LDS
ParseRelationtracking. - [ ] Update LDS database schema to allow for query matching in the database layer itself.
For anyone reaching this issue as a result of currently bad LDS performance here's our current recommendations:
- Keep your object schemas as small as possible - the faster it is to parse them from JSON, the better.
- Relations are currently inefficient. If you can avoid them, do so.
- Minimize usage of any values of the following classes:
Collectionand its subclassesMapand its subclassesParseACLParseGeoPoint
- Whenever possible, use smaller pins. Because LDS loads all objects in a single pin before evaluating a query, the smaller the pin is, the better.
See https://github.com/ParsePlatform/Parse-SDK-iOS-OSX/issues/32
Is there any documentation concerning which version is the fastest ? @FreudGit uploaded an interesting spreadsheet in ParsePlatform/Parse-SDK-iOS-OSX#32 and I'm wondering if performance improvement are shared between iOS/Android
@grantland After our application is scaling a bit, we are hitting the performance ceiling on the LDS. I have started seeing some activity lately on the Parse-Android-SDK (almost after an year). Are there any plans to resolve the performance issues with LDS in android. Anyways, I have the following questions regarding the performance tips mentioned above:
- When you say "Keep your object schemas as small as possible - the faster it is to parse them from JSON, the better.", what is the scale you are talking about?
- When you say avoid using "
Collectionand its subclasses" and "Mapand its subclasses", you mean not to use these in the extended customParseObjectsat java layer? - "Whenever possible, use smaller pins", do you recommend to have less number of entries in a particular class that I have pinned or do you recommend that I can have thousands of records pinned for a particular class but pin then sets of, let's say, 100 records?