OADP-6306 Removed third-level headings in a module

[Pkylas007]

Version(s):

• 4.19, 4.20

Issue:

• OADP-6306

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

• [ ] QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

[ocpdocs-previewbot]

🤖 Wed Jul 09 12:12:32 - Prow CI generated the docs preview:

https://95328--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/backup_and_restore/application_backup_and_restore/oadp-features-plugins.html https://95328--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/backup_and_restore/application_backup_and_restore/troubleshooting/issues-with-velero-and-admission-webhooks.html https://95328--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-rosa/latest/backup_and_restore/application_backup_and_restore/oadp-features-plugins.html

[anarnold97]

Comparison with OKD to ensure parity in rendering:

Preview	OKD
Velero plugin panics during imagestream backups due to a missing secret	Velero plugin panics during imagestream backups due to a missing secret
Workaround to avoid the panic error	Workaround to avoid the panic error
OpenShift ADP Controller segmentation fault	OpenShift ADP Controller segmentation fault
OpenShift ADP Controller segmentation fault workaround	OpenShift ADP Controller segmentation fault workaround

[Pkylas007]

i think you might have misunderstood this we should not just change Level 3 headers to Level 2 we should try and keep the taxonomy intact so in this case, please could we think about changing into modules to keep the taxonomy

Sure, no problem! That was the other option I discussed with the team. Will do, thanks!

[openshift-ci[bot]]

@Pkylas007: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

[Pkylas007]

@anarnold97 I added new modules without affecting the taxonomy (I think). Please could you take a look when you find time?

[openshift-bot]

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle stale. Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close. Exclude this issue from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle stale

[openshift-merge-robot]

PR needs rebase.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[Pkylas007]

The work planned in this PR was carried out in Troubleshooting guide modularization work. Hence, closing this PR without merging. Thanks!