joss-reviews
joss-reviews copied to clipboard
openjournals
[PRE REVIEW]: PoUnce: A framework for automatized uncertainty quantification simulations on high-performance clusters
Submitting author: @JakobBD (Jakob Dürrwächter) Repository: https://github.com/JakobBD/pounce Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v1.0.0 Editor: @Nikoleta-v3 Reviewers: Pending Managing EiC: Arfon Smith
Status
Status badge code:
HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/c62521adac904e832a1ac4130406f80f"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/c62521adac904e832a1ac4130406f80f/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/c62521adac904e832a1ac4130406f80f)
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @JakobBD. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@JakobBD if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:
@editorialbot commands
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdf
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88 T=0.07 s (931.7 files/s, 108547.8 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python 33 935 1024 2973
YAML 14 91 86 802
Markdown 13 225 0 762
TeX 4 53 54 701
JSON 1 0 0 51
make 1 11 6 27
INI 1 0 0 5
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 67 1315 1170 5321
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.1287/opre.1070.0496 is OK
- 10.1007/3-540-45346-6_5 is OK
- 10.1137/16M1082469 is OK
- 10.1137/15M1046472 is OK
- 10.2172/1177077 is OK
- 10.1016/j.jocs.2020.101204 is OK
- 10.1137/S1064827503427741 is OK
- 10.1016/j.jocs.2015.08.008 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.02871 is OK
- 10.1061/9780784413609.257 is OK
- 10.1142/S2591728518500445 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.16303 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.21389 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- None
INVALID DOIs
- None
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
Dear editors, Possible reviewers include salrm8, georgiastuart, Himscipy, and AnjaliSandip/. Best, Jakob
Hey @JakobBD 👋🏻 Thank you again for your submission. Could you please take a look through this: https://bit.ly/joss-reviewers and suggest at least four potential reviewers?
Hey @Nikoleta-v3, Potential reviewers include salrm8, georgiastuart, Himscipy, and AnjaliSandip/. Best, Jakob
👋 @salrm8 & @georgiastuart & @AnjaliSandip would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS?
We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html
The submission I'd like you to review is titled: "PoUnce: A framework for automatized uncertainty quantification simulations on high-performance clusters". You can find more information at the top of this Github issue 🆙
Please let me know if you're available 😄 Thank you!
I'm sorry human, I don't understand that. You can see what commands I support by typing:
@editorialbot commands
I'm sorry human, I don't understand that. You can see what commands I support by typing:
@editorialbot commands
Hello @Nikoleta-v3, here are the things you can ask me to do:
# List all available commands
@editorialbot commands
# Add to this issue's reviewers list
@editorialbot add @username as reviewer
# Remove from this issue's reviewers list
@editorialbot remove @username from reviewers
# Get a list of all editors's GitHub handles
@editorialbot list editors
# Assign a user as the editor of this submission
@editorialbot assign @username as editor
# Remove the editor assigned to this submission
@editorialbot remove editor
# Remind an author or reviewer to return to a review after a
# certain period of time (supported units days and weeks)
@editorialbot remind @reviewer in 2 weeks
# Check the references of the paper for missing DOIs
@editorialbot check references
# Perform checks on the repository
@editorialbot check repository
# Adds a checklist for the reviewer using this command
@editorialbot generate my checklist
# Set a value for version
@editorialbot set v1.0.0 as version
# Set a value for archive
@editorialbot set 10.21105/zenodo.12345 as archive
# Set a value for branch
@editorialbot set joss-paper as branch
# Set a value for repository
@editorialbot set https://github.com/organization/repo as repository
# Generates the pdf paper
@editorialbot generate pdf
# Recommends the submission for acceptance
@editorialbot recommend-accept
# Flag submission with questionable scope
@editorialbot query scope
# Get a link to the complete list of reviewers
@editorialbot list reviewers
# Open the review issue
@editorialbot start review