jdk icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
jdk copied to clipboard

8335124: com/sun/management/ThreadMXBean/ThreadCpuTimeArray.java failed with CPU time out of expected range

Open kevinjwalls opened this issue 1 year ago • 5 comments
trafficstars

Clean backport to jdk23 of a simple test update, to try and avoid spurious failures.


Progress

  • [ ] Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • [x] Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • [x] Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8335124: com/sun/management/ThreadMXBean/ThreadCpuTimeArray.java failed with CPU time out of expected range (Bug - P4)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/19999/head:pull/19999
$ git checkout pull/19999

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/19999
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/19999/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 19999

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 19999

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/19999.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

kevinjwalls avatar Jul 03 '24 08:07 kevinjwalls

:wave: Welcome back kevinw! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into jdk23 will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

bridgekeeper[bot] avatar Jul 03 '24 08:07 bridgekeeper[bot]

@kevinjwalls This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8335124: com/sun/management/ThreadMXBean/ThreadCpuTimeArray.java failed with CPU time out of expected range

Reviewed-by: cjplummer

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 6 new commits pushed to the jdk23 branch:

  • 2f60d3684843e42c2c4c3bf628ac6d62dcdfcadb: 8335475: ClassBuilder incorrectly calculates max_locals in some cases
  • b415b981397395eac298dfc841d1a9d012f62501: 8334297: (so) java/nio/channels/SocketChannel/OpenLeak.java should not depend on SecurityManager
  • 90d5b5b4c497ac99d0e2ade689b6459fffea3e2a: 8324089: Fix typo in the manual page for "jcmd" (man jcmd)
  • 653c481d71b3c5c6bc1e867d88a560495557876c: 8335479: JFR: Missing documentation for -XX:StartFlightRecording
  • 10b28babe53821fcdeef3a1aa0712feb7cd67529: 8322812: Manpage for jcmd is missing JFR.view command
  • d383365ea4196cd5f40de217547392b820c4ad01: 8334890: Missing unconditional cross modifying fence in nmethod entry barriers

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the jdk23 branch. As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the jdk23 branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

openjdk[bot] avatar Jul 03 '24 08:07 openjdk[bot]

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

openjdk[bot] avatar Jul 03 '24 08:07 openjdk[bot]

@kevinjwalls The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • jmx
  • serviceability

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

openjdk[bot] avatar Jul 03 '24 08:07 openjdk[bot]

Webrevs

mlbridge[bot] avatar Jul 03 '24 08:07 mlbridge[bot]

/integrate

kevinjwalls avatar Jul 09 '24 19:07 kevinjwalls

Going to push as commit 70ad622bc23fc5a1808466193fd6c7ea2f178ec9. Since your change was applied there have been 9 commits pushed to the jdk23 branch:

  • ca37a482cce9ad2bd57221f7ae34ac8246cd1843: 8334757: AssertionError: Missing type variable in where clause
  • ae10055b2cbd00734d41feef5251b52883151abb: 8335824: Test gc/arguments/TestMinInitialErgonomics.java is timing out
  • 4e5232097902b7d30f9bd6e21f3936d29462375f: 8334433: jshell.exe runs an executable test.exe on startup
  • 2f60d3684843e42c2c4c3bf628ac6d62dcdfcadb: 8335475: ClassBuilder incorrectly calculates max_locals in some cases
  • b415b981397395eac298dfc841d1a9d012f62501: 8334297: (so) java/nio/channels/SocketChannel/OpenLeak.java should not depend on SecurityManager
  • 90d5b5b4c497ac99d0e2ade689b6459fffea3e2a: 8324089: Fix typo in the manual page for "jcmd" (man jcmd)
  • 653c481d71b3c5c6bc1e867d88a560495557876c: 8335479: JFR: Missing documentation for -XX:StartFlightRecording
  • 10b28babe53821fcdeef3a1aa0712feb7cd67529: 8322812: Manpage for jcmd is missing JFR.view command
  • d383365ea4196cd5f40de217547392b820c4ad01: 8334890: Missing unconditional cross modifying fence in nmethod entry barriers

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

openjdk[bot] avatar Jul 09 '24 19:07 openjdk[bot]

@kevinjwalls Pushed as commit 70ad622bc23fc5a1808466193fd6c7ea2f178ec9.

:bulb: You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

openjdk[bot] avatar Jul 09 '24 19:07 openjdk[bot]