Add count puzzle for eval logic and math ability
Thank you for contributing an eval! ♥️
🚨 Please make sure your PR follows these guidelines, failure to follow the guidelines below will result in the PR being closed automatically. Note that even if the criteria are met, that does not guarantee the PR will be merged nor GPT-4 access granted. 🚨
PLEASE READ THIS:
In order for a PR to be merged, it must fail on GPT-4. We are aware that right now, users do not have access, so you will not be able to tell if the eval fails or not. Please run your eval with GPT-3.5-Turbo, but keep in mind as we run the eval, if GPT-4 gets higher than 90% on the eval, we will likely reject since GPT-4 is already capable of completing the task.
We plan to roll out a way for users submitting evals to see the eval performance on GPT-4 soon. Stay tuned! Until then, you will not be able to see the eval performance on GPT-4. We encourage partial PR's with ~5-10 example that we can then run the evals on and share the results with you so you know how your eval does with GPT-4 before writing all 100 examples.
Eval details 📑
Eval name
[Insert Eval name here]
Eval description
I add two puzzles related to counting. It can help test the logic of math ability of the model.
What makes this a useful eval?
Solving the most difficult puzzle needs strong logic reasoning, the last one is even too difficult to solve without strong math skills.
Criteria for a good eval ✅
Below are some of the criteria we look for in a good eval. In general, we are seeking cases where the model does not do a good job despite being capable of generating a good response (note that there are some things large language models cannot do, so those would not make good evals).
Your eval should be:
- [x] Thematically consistent: The eval should be thematically consistent. We'd like to see a number of prompts all demonstrating some particular failure mode. For example, we can create an eval on cases where the model fails to reason about the physical world.
- [x] Contains failures where a human can do the task, but either GPT-4 or GPT-3.5-Turbo could not.
- [x] Includes good signal around what is the right behavior. This means either a correct answer for
Basicevals or theFactModel-graded eval, or an exhaustive rubric for evaluating answers for theCriteriaModel-graded eval. - [ ] Include at least 100 high quality examples (it is okay to only contribute 5-10 meaningful examples and have us test them with GPT-4 before adding all 100)
If there is anything else that makes your eval worth including, please document it below.
Unique eval value
Insert what makes your eval high quality that was not mentioned above. (Not required)
Eval structure 🏗️
Your eval should
- [x] Check that your data is in
evals/registry/data/{name} - [x] Check that your yaml is registered at
evals/registry/evals/{name}.jsonl - [x] Ensure you have the right to use the data you submit via this eval
(For now, we will only be approving evals that use one of the existing eval classes. You may still write custom eval classes for your own cases, and we may consider merging them in the future.)
Final checklist 👀
Submission agreement
By contributing to Evals, you are agreeing to make your evaluation logic and data under the same MIT license as this repository. You must have adequate rights to upload any data used in an Eval. OpenAI reserves the right to use this data in future service improvements to our product. Contributions to OpenAI Evals will be subject to our usual Usage Policies (https://platform.openai.com/docs/usage-policies).
- [x] I agree that my submission will be made available under an MIT license and complies with OpenAI's usage policies.
Email address validation
If your submission is accepted, we will be granting GPT-4 access to a limited number of contributors. Access will be given to the email address associated with the merged pull request.
- [x] I acknowledge that GPT-4 access will only be granted, if applicable, to the email address used for my merged pull request.
Limited availability acknowledgement
We know that you might be excited to contribute to OpenAI's mission, help improve our models, and gain access to GPT-4. However, due to the requirements mentioned above and high volume of submissions, we will not be able to accept all submissions and thus not grant everyone who opens a PR GPT-4 access. We know this is disappointing, but we hope to set the right expectation before you open this PR.
- [x] I understand that opening a PR, even if it meets the requirements above, does not guarantee the PR will be merged nor GPT-4 access granted.
Submit eval
- [x] I have filled out all required fields in the evals PR form
- [ ] (Ignore if not submitting code) I have run
pip install pre-commit; pre-commit installand have verified thatblack,isort, andautoflakeare running when I commit and push
Failure to fill out all required fields will result in the PR being closed.
Eval JSON data
Since we are using Git LFS, we are asking eval submitters to add in as many Eval Samples (at least 5) from their contribution here:
View evals in JSON
Eval
{"input": [{"role": "system", "content": "Answer the math puzzle for counting."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Thinking about the set {1,2,3,4,5}, how many subsets there are for the set? We assume empty set {} is also one subset. You can give the expression as answer instead of a concrete number if it's larger than 1000."}], "ideal": "32"}
{"input": [{"role": "system", "content": "Answer the math puzzle for counting."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Thinking about the set {1,2,3,4,5,6,7}, how many subsets there are for the set? We assume empty set {} is also one subset. You can give the expression as answer instead of a concrete number if it's larger than 1000."}], "ideal": "128"}
{"input": [{"role": "system", "content": "Answer the math puzzle for counting."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Thinking about the set {1,2,3,4,5}, among all the subsets, how many subsets there are whose sum can be divided by 5? We assume that sum of {} is 0, and can be divided by 5. You can give the expression as answer instead of a concrete number if it's larger than 1000."}], "ideal": "8"}
{"input": [{"role": "system", "content": "Answer the math puzzle for counting."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Thinking about the set {1,2,3,4,5,6,7}, among all the subsets, how many subsets there are whose sum can be divided by 7? We assume that sum of {} is 0, and can be divided by 7. You can give the expression as answer instead of a concrete number if it's larger than 1000."}], "ideal": "20"}
{"input": [{"role": "system", "content": "Answer the math puzzle for counting."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Thinking about the set {1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17}, how many subsets there are for the set? We assume empty set {} is also one subset. You can give the expression as answer instead of a concrete number if it's larger than 1000."}], "ideal": "2**17"}
{"input": [{"role": "system", "content": "Answer the math puzzle for counting."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Thinking about the set {1,2,3,4,...,2021,2022,2023}, how many subsets there are for the set? We assume empty set {} is also one subset. You can give the expression as answer instead of a concrete number if it's larger than 1000"}], "ideal": "2**2023"}
{"input": [{"role": "system", "content": "Answer the math puzzle for counting."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Thinking about the set {1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14}, among all the subsets, how many subsets there are whose sum can be divided by 7? We assume that sum of {} is 0, and can be divided by 7. You can give the expression as answer instead of a concrete number if it's larger than 1000. E.g. you can say there are (2**14) / 7 subsets satisfying the condition."}], "ideal": "2344"}
{"input": [{"role": "system", "content": "Answer the math puzzle for counting."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Thinking about the set {1,2,3,4,...,2021,2022,2023}, among all the subsets, how many subsets there are whose sum can be divided by 7? We assume that sum of {} is 0, and can be divided by 7. You can give the expression as answer instead of a concrete number if it's larger than 1000. E.g. you can say there are (2**2023) / 7 subsets satisfying the condition."}], "ideal": "(2**2023+6*2**289)/7"}
Hi, thank you for the contribution,
Could you please make sure the JSONL is in
git-lfs? Thanks
@andrew-openai Hi, sorry I didn't know the git-lfs stuff. It's fixed now I hope, please take a look at the update, thanks.
Closing the PR due to inactivity; please reopen if you get a chance to address comments.