opentelemetry-operator
opentelemetry-operator copied to clipboard
chore: document minimal security context settings
Add documentation that describes how to use opentelemetry-operator in restrictive clusters, such as enabling runAsRoot, dropping capabilities, and configuring seccomp confinement.
Closes: #1264
The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA.
- :white_check_mark: login: jawnsy / name: Jonathan Yu (a39a5e02ff750237c54d58a255f0528b11a2915b)
Ah, apologies, I need to clear up the CLA issue before I can proceed
Sorry for the long delay, and thanks for your patience. I've rebased and addressed comments (removed the reference to the API file), and this pull request is now ready for another review.
Any update on this?
@pavolloffay @frzifus Hey, I've rebased and this should be ready for review when you have a moment!
Awesome thanks @jawnsy
Thanks guys. Greatly appreciated.
@jawnsy Still need one more for this to get merged <3
Still need one more for this to get merged <3
@R011y Sorry, can you please clarify -- what are the next steps here? Do I need to make more changes, or are we waiting for another review?
Still need one more for this to get merged <3
@R011y Sorry, can you please clarify -- what are the next steps here? Do I need to make more changes, or are we waiting for another review?
Just needs another review. No changes requested.
Just for awareness in case others come across this issue: Otel operator CAN be run with restrictive security context without issue. It functions correctly with both allowPrivilegeEscalation: false and readOnlyRootFilesystem: true. The documentation update in this PR will just cement the existing ability to run Otel operator with restrictive security context. That said, it's always best to test thoroughly in your environment as there may be conditions or variability that present issues not identified here.
Add me as a reviewer if you want @jawnsy, if that's possible.
@R011y mind reviewing this so i can merge this finally?
Closing as inactive. Please comment if you would like to reopen this pull request.
It's unfortunate that this was closed, it seemed ready to merge and only needed reviews?
I'm happy to rebase this if you'll consider reviewing and merging