opentelemetry-collector
opentelemetry-collector copied to clipboard
[docs/rfc] RFC about environment variables
Description: Adds an RFC about how environment variable resolution should work Link to tracking Issue: Fixes #9515, relates to:
- #8215
- #8565
- #9162
- #9531
- #9532
Codecov Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Project coverage is 91.70%. Comparing base (
65cdb18) to head (90db1c0). Report is 37 commits behind head on main.
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #9854 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 91.95% 91.70% -0.25%
==========================================
Files 357 358 +1
Lines 16501 16543 +42
==========================================
- Hits 15173 15171 -2
- Misses 1000 1045 +45
+ Partials 328 327 -1
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
Remaining work
- [x] Decide on https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector/pull/9854#discussion_r1561181980 by raising this on the spec and seeing if we can align on that
- Filed open-telemetry/opentelemetry-specification/pull/4002
- [x] ~~Decide on https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector/pull/9854#discussion_r1549449041. I am going to try and do a PoC of the confmap behavior to double check what makes more sense~~
Remaining work
* [ ] Decide on [[docs/rfc] RFC about environment variables #9854 (comment)](https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector/pull/9854#discussion_r1561181980) by raising this on the spec and seeing if we can align on that * Filed [[configuration] Fail on unsupported identifiers opentelemetry-specification#4002](https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-specification/pull/4002) * [ ] Decide on [[docs/rfc] RFC about environment variables #9854 (comment)](https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector/pull/9854#discussion_r1549449041). I am going to try and do a PoC of the confmap behavior to double check what makes more sense
@mx-psi it looks like the spec issue will merge within the next 2 days, is the second issue still blocking this work?
@codeboten I haven't written a fully working PoC yet. I am fine merging this without the PoC if everybody else is okay with it (it may mean minor changes while we work on implementing this)
Let's merge this and change it as needed, the spec change was merged 👍🏻