onbjerg

cc @mattsse

Was this fixed in #2046 @joshieDo?

>contracts/src/test/utils/Utilities.t.sol should be ignored as it is a test utility and is in the test folder. If there is a contract in that file that does not have a `test`...

Bump on this - the linked code does not even compile for me Running on master and re-reading the original issue: - We could filter the Utilities contract out by...

@Genysys Can you update the branch to reflect a state I can compile it in? I am currently unable to do so because some files are missing - some of...

I do not see `Marketplace.sol` in there, is something wrong with the report for `LandNFT.sol`?

No, not yet

@Genysys After #2927 the report looks reasonable to me on the branch you linked in https://github.com/foundry-rs/foundry/issues/2668#issuecomment-1215692287. Remember to set the fork url for coverage too. This is what I did:...

@joshieDo The source map is always present unless the contract is abstract or a library with only internal functions (those don't have bytecode). The optimizer just makes the source map...

Closed since it's a source map issue in Solidity, created #2726 for the optimizer issue