onbjerg

It's not, this is for the long term solution/re-enabling of what we disabled in #7753

Thanks for flagging, reopened it for consideration:)

cc @joshieDo might be static file related?

some hardforks are only conditioned on the timestamp and not the block number which is why some of them do not have a block number:)

Is the forkhash supposed to be 00000000, do you have a source on that? That sounds incorrect

These can't be associated types simply because an associated type means that there is only one valid type for the trait implementation. The providers are generic over the network and...

Sorry, you're correct about the blanket implementation 🤦🏻 I'm just waking up. You are also correct about the 1:1 correspondence As far as I know though, associated types are not...

@developeruche we want to document it in the code where this is the case so it shows up on docs.rs, so e.g. in the call builder

Oh, you are right. Perhaps the request is probably moreso the real-time update of the counter (if supported by your terminal) than the count itself? Generally we should work on...

I agree it would be valuable to have some sort of real-time counter. Let's track it here then :sweat_smile: Can you update the original issue to reflect it?