onbjerg

Closed in #2528

I'm unsure what the use case for this is, given scripts are assumed to use cheatcodes which would not be deployable in a live environment. When you run a script...

Are the first gas numbers from `forge test` or from `forge test --gas-report`? Also, it is expected that there are two sets of reports (one for proxy, one for implementation)...

> still don't understand the separate reports you have for the proxy and the implementation, what are you saying is the difference for example for the call to mint function...

1. The difference for `MinimalProxyFactory` is accounted for as explained above; Foundry's output does not include the 21000 gas stipend. There is a small difference of about 400 gas outside...

The account is still hot, though. For more information on what that means: https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-2929 Specifically: >When an address is either the target of a (EXTCODESIZE (0x3B), EXTCODECOPY (0x3C), EXTCODEHASH (0x3F)...

Not entirely sure how this feature would answer those questions without some sort of time scale/log, can you expand on that?

No libraries are supported at the moment

Probably related to us not padding some parameters correctly for Hardhat

Where are you running `forge script`? I can't reproduce it: this works fine for me. ``` FOO=bar ``` in `.env` in root of project ``` forge script script/Contract.s.sol ``` executes...