Jaka Hudoklin

If I imagine correctly, you want to use SimpleDB for storing directory structure. I don't think that dependency on two services would be the right way. Wouldn't it be more...

Looks like i've missed out that part of code, nice job ;)

Yes you can request the vault invertory(which i think should be returned fast) using [this](http://docs.amazonwebservices.com/amazonglacier/2012-06-01/dev/api-initiate-job-post.html) and then get result using [this](http://docs.amazonwebservices.com/amazonglacier/2012-06-01/dev/api-job-output-get.html), but by description, I don't know if that is...

Here is [one](https://github.com/terencehonles/fusepy/blob/master/examples/memory.py) example for fuse, it shouldn't be really hard to implement this, but first we need full support for SimpleDB, includinc sync option. Also core functionality(creating, deleting vaults,...

If we than put fuse here or in another project is not that important, because we have to implement quite some things first. The problem is boto is not going...

Thanks! It looks like we gonna end with 3 separated projects(glacier-cmd-interface,glacier-sdb-wrapper and fuse intergration), this is going to be fun :D

We have to see if our wip model fits their model, or if we can shape it so it will fit.

Nice findings, i don't know why either :) Mmap has to be considered as experimental for people not having enough memory. For example if you remove your drive or error...

Wow i never expected there would be such problems with mmaping in python, but i think mmaping should be still considered experimental. At the same time it would be awesome...

What you need to do is to open new file for every process you make, using multiprocessing, then it must work! This is the only correct way to implement this...