E

Thankyou. >Is there a simpler command to generate the man page instead of cargo run --bin uudoc --features uudoc -- manpage ? I think `README.md` should guide to use `uudoc`...

Failing tests (with non useful message for me)

@aaron-ang Q. When packager discards `uudoc` binary at release, Should packager use same release profile with `coreutils` too? Is building `uudoc` with debug and `coreutils` with `release` improve build time?...

Thankyou. I feel uudoc takes time at clean build, but understood that current form is optimal.

I consider this should be done at downstream and upstream cannot do anything.

`PROG_PRFIX` [breaks shell completion files](https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/packaging/packages/uutils-coreutils/-/issues/1#note_253681). Fixing `GNUmakefile` is not enough to fix it. Symlinked completions does not work. If we also build `GNU Coreutils` as a multi-call binary. We can...

~Supporting two install passes are really strange.~ ~I noticed that we can `make install` twice with different `PROG_PRFIX` and `BINDIR` without building twice. It also solves~ ~>PROG_PRFIX [breaks shell completion...

>PROG_PRFIX breaks shell completion >Fixing GNUmakefile is not enough to fix it. I noticed that fixing `GNUmakefile` is very reasonable approach to add this option also for `fish` and `zsh`...

People needs workaround without patch can `make SKIP_UTILS="runcon chcon"` even `libselinux.so` is installed.

@sylvestre Would you reopen this as current PR looks not acceptible for you?