multicoretests
multicoretests copied to clipboard
Share more code between STM and Lin
At the moment, STM and Lin share fairly little code. I see a few other opportunities that might be worth exploring:
SpecinSTMandCmdSpecinLinshare a lot of functionality, with slight mismatches (arbitraryvs separateGen.tandShrink.t)- bridging that gap might open the way for generic commands in
STMas inLin_api, though I’m not sure that could be used without makingnext_staterather hard to write - I think bringing something similar to
STM’tytoLinwould allow to build a safeequal_res.
(Some of those suggestions were open during a discussion with @n-osborne)