Benjamin

Consider this example: ``` net 21, -1, ifelse(playerFinalPoints == 21, ifelse(dealerOutcome == 1, 0, ifelse(dealerOutcome == 7, 0, 1)), ifelse(dealerOutcome == 2, ifelse(playerFinalPoints < 22, 1, -1), ifelse(dealerOutcome == 3,...

It's possible we could use something like `dealerOutcome == "#Bust,BJDealer$dealerOutcome#", but I don't think that saves much typing. The major issue is that the`rToJags` function deals with converting R code...

This is now implemented into the `current-devel` branch. The final function name is `factorFormula` and I even implemented it in the Decision Networks vignette if you'd like to see it...

Truthfully, yes. It just means passing _every_ formula through `factorFormula` within `setNode` and not exporting `factorFormula`. (well, we could still export it, we just wouldn't have to, and I would...

I added an error in circumstances where there is no accompanying `factorLevels` entry for the variable. I think it's important to make this a hard error--the downstream consequences are catastrophic....

From the look of it, I don't think HydeNet will support a truncated distribution. This isn't a complexity we considered. You could use HydeNet to construct the model without the...

The current devel branch includes a `gaze` function. It doesn't actually apply `dust`, but it does format into the stargazer like format. I haven't worked out significance stars yet, but...

I'm not sure a separate sprinkle for the stars is the direction I would go for this. Aside from my personal feelings that the stars are tacky (I've never included...

That took an unexpected turn. See my gist here where I've added some functionality for stars to `pvalString` https://gist.github.com/nutterb/4a827cfe2403900d72153451c493ccc6 Running the code in that gist gives me the table depicted...

I assure I'm not ignoring this. I'm quite interested in anything that can reduce my dependency footprint. I'm just not in a position to give this as thorough a review...