The Classifier Performs way better than the Detector

[nikhilcss97]

These are the benchmark accuracy% numbers I ran for different models across versions on a dataset of 10,000 images. The classifier performs way better than the detectors including the latest detector. This dataset consisted of all NSFW images.

@bedapudi6788 Can we please release the updated classifier model as well? Would be very helpful if we can get increased accuracy on it.

Threshold	0	0.2	0.4	0.5	0.6	0.7	0.75	0.8	0.85	0.9	0.95
Nudenet 320m v3.4.2	60.6	60.6	46.58	37.77	26.33	14.3	8	2.76	0.24	0.03	0
NudeNet 640m v3.4.2	59.11	59.11	45.81	36.34	25.4	12.56	6.24	1.94	0.09	0	0
NudeNet Classifier v2.0.9**	100	100	100	100	100	100	100	100	100	78.06	50.75
NudeNet Classifier v2.0.9 with FACE Labels	66.53	66.53	54.24	47.26	38.05	26.68	19.38	10.82	2.65	0.03	0
NudeNet Detector v2.0.9	54.95	54.95	54.95	54.95	40.44	23.62	14.91	7.56	3.05	0.77	0.09
OpenNSFW v0.14.0	100	89.47	74.97	66.66	58.21	48.27	43.06	37.5	31.46	24.73	15.97

** - The NudeNet Classifier v2.0.9 100% accuracy might be a little biased since we got this data from this model itself.

[nikhilcss97]

@bedapudi6788

Also, if possible can you please share the dataset you used to train the detector or the source from where you got that dataset?

[ryliu68]

Hi, if there are any updates about this issue, please let me know. Thank you both. @nikhilcss97 @bedapudi6788

[ryliu68]

Hi, @nikhilcss97; how do you construct your dataset? Have you tried to label the dataset? I need some help to label some datasets collected by myself. Thank you.

[henryruhs]

I can recommend this Yolo11 based NSFW detector:

https://huggingface.co/erax-ai/EraX-NSFW-V1.0

Version 1.0 performs better than NudeNet 2 and 3 from what I can tell. Their version 1.1 under performs for some reason.