Nicolas Franck

Results 141 comments of Nicolas Franck

Shouldn't there be a place for administrative data? I mean: "primary research organisation" and "funder" look in the wizard like fields that do not have anything to do the selection...

Or: #### Choose your template `--Select your primary research organisation--` `--Select your funder--` `--Select your template--` All of them would have to be select boxes, and each of them is...

maybe redirect with filled in parameters in the URL? A bit ugly, but I wouldn't know any other way. Although that would make it impossible to mark the input values...

Well this is how we revised it: * hide the tab of contributor * for every collaborator, look for a contributor with the same email, and show its rights in...

That explains why it is just a list of plans without adding links to the "show" or "edit" page. So instead of being a list of plans belong to this...

Something else that I saw: the list of plans that belongs to an organisation is only based on access permission `Role.administrator` (co-owner). Shouldn't `Role.creator` also be included?

> Something else that I saw: the list of plans that belongs to an organisation is only based on access permission `Role.administrator` (co-owner). Shouldn't `Role.creator` also be included? Never mind,...

..and then hit the problem again when someone tries to create a plan using the api. I think it is a safer, and more clear way to implement this via...

I use puma as backend server. The shibboleth parameters are passed by HTTP header as shown in your configuration. I "fixed" this by overriding this function call in omniauth-shibboleth: https://github.com/DMPbelgium/roadmap/blob/master/config/initializers/devise_ugent.rb#L66...