netobserv-ebpf-agent
netobserv-ebpf-agent copied to clipboard
NETOBSERV-1792: Added update-build script to add downstream labels
Description
Added update-build script to add downstream labels
Dependencies
n/a
Checklist
If you are not familiar with our processes or don't know what to answer in the list below, let us know in a comment: the maintainers will take care of that.
- [X] Will this change affect NetObserv / Network Observability operator? If not, you can ignore the rest of this checklist.
- [ ] Is this PR backed with a JIRA ticket? If so, make sure it is written as a title prefix (in general, PRs affecting the NetObserv/Network Observability product should be backed with a JIRA ticket - especially if they bring user facing changes).
- [ ] Does this PR require product documentation?
- [ ] If so, make sure the JIRA epic is labelled with "documentation" and provides a description relevant for doc writers, such as use cases or scenarios. Any required step to activate or configure the feature should be documented there, such as new CRD knobs.
- [ ] Does this PR require a product release notes entry?
- [ ] If so, fill in "Release Note Text" in the JIRA.
- [ ] Is there anything else the QE team should know before testing? E.g: configuration changes, environment setup, etc.
- [ ] If so, make sure it is described in the JIRA ticket.
- QE requirements (check 1 from the list):
- [ ] Standard QE validation, with pre-merge tests unless stated otherwise.
- [ ] Regression tests only (e.g. refactoring with no user-facing change).
- [ ] No QE (e.g. trivial change with high reviewer's confidence, or per agreement with the QE team).
@OlivierCazade: This pull request references NETOBSERV-1792 which is a valid jira issue.
Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the task to target the "4.18.0" version, but no target version was set.
In response to this:
Description
Dependencies
n/a
Checklist
If you are not familiar with our processes or don't know what to answer in the list below, let us know in a comment: the maintainers will take care of that.
- [ ] Will this change affect NetObserv / Network Observability operator? If not, you can ignore the rest of this checklist.
- [ ] Is this PR backed with a JIRA ticket? If so, make sure it is written as a title prefix (in general, PRs affecting the NetObserv/Network Observability product should be backed with a JIRA ticket - especially if they bring user facing changes).
- [ ] Does this PR require product documentation?
- [ ] If so, make sure the JIRA epic is labelled with "documentation" and provides a description relevant for doc writers, such as use cases or scenarios. Any required step to activate or configure the feature should be documented there, such as new CRD knobs.
- [ ] Does this PR require a product release notes entry?
- [ ] If so, fill in "Release Note Text" in the JIRA.
- [ ] Is there anything else the QE team should know before testing? E.g: configuration changes, environment setup, etc.
- [ ] If so, make sure it is described in the JIRA ticket.
- QE requirements (check 1 from the list):
- [ ] Standard QE validation, with pre-merge tests unless stated otherwise.
- [ ] Regression tests only (e.g. refactoring with no user-facing change).
- [ ] No QE (e.g. trivial change with high reviewer's confidence, or per agreement with the QE team).
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.
@OlivierCazade: This pull request references NETOBSERV-1792 which is a valid jira issue.
Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the task to target the "4.18.0" version, but no target version was set.
In response to this:
Description
Added update-build script to add downstream labels
Dependencies
n/a
Checklist
If you are not familiar with our processes or don't know what to answer in the list below, let us know in a comment: the maintainers will take care of that.
- [X] Will this change affect NetObserv / Network Observability operator? If not, you can ignore the rest of this checklist.
- [ ] Is this PR backed with a JIRA ticket? If so, make sure it is written as a title prefix (in general, PRs affecting the NetObserv/Network Observability product should be backed with a JIRA ticket - especially if they bring user facing changes).
- [ ] Does this PR require product documentation?
- [ ] If so, make sure the JIRA epic is labelled with "documentation" and provides a description relevant for doc writers, such as use cases or scenarios. Any required step to activate or configure the feature should be documented there, such as new CRD knobs.
- [ ] Does this PR require a product release notes entry?
- [ ] If so, fill in "Release Note Text" in the JIRA.
- [ ] Is there anything else the QE team should know before testing? E.g: configuration changes, environment setup, etc.
- [ ] If so, make sure it is described in the JIRA ticket.
- QE requirements (check 1 from the list):
- [ ] Standard QE validation, with pre-merge tests unless stated otherwise.
- [ ] Regression tests only (e.g. refactoring with no user-facing change).
- [ ] No QE (e.g. trivial change with high reviewer's confidence, or per agreement with the QE team).
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.
Codecov Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Please upload report for BASE (
main@47e9fb8). Learn more about missing BASE report. Report is 14 commits behind head on main.
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #386 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage ? 30.94%
=======================================
Files ? 49
Lines ? 3907
Branches ? 0
=======================================
Hits ? 1209
Misses ? 2595
Partials ? 103
| Flag | Coverage Δ | |
|---|---|---|
| unittests | 30.94% <ø> (?) |
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
/lgtm
/approve
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED
This pull-request has been approved by: OlivierCazade
The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
The pull request process is described here
- ~~OWNERS~~ [OlivierCazade]
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment